Weighted
Roster Sorting Formula

ac ag di en ha in sp st { 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, 2, 4 } // qb { 3, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 4, 5 } // fb { 3, 2, 1, 2, 4, 1, 5, 2 } // hb { 3, 2, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 5 } // te { 3, 2, 1, 3, 5, 1, 4, 1 } // wr { 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 5 } // c { 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 3, 5 } // g { 5, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 5 } // t { 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 4, 4 } // de { 5, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 5 } // dt { 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 4 } // lb { 3, 4, 1, 3, 2, 2, 4, 1 } // cb { 2, 2, 1, 3, 4, 2, 4, 2 } // s { 1, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 1, 7 } // k { 1, 1, 6, 1, 2, 1, 1, 7 } // p

In the old way just two ratings were considered. For example, for
a QB, IN and ST were weighted equally , so whomever had the
highest IN+ST was first. The other ratings didn't matter one bit
to the sorting.

In the new way, the
QB's are rated using all of their ratings, but some ratings have
more importance than others. The mathematical formula would be
1*AC + 1*AG + 2*DI + 2*EN + 3*HA + 5*IN + 2*SP + 4*ST. In other
words, IN is most important (5), with ST being slightly less
important (4). AC and AG are the least important (1), with IN
being 5 times more important and ST being 4 times more important
than either of them.